Focusing on prisoner swaps and a comprehensive deal is smart, but suspending talks over the Philadelphi axis might backfire if Israel sees it as bad faith.
Hamas says they’re still committed to the ceasefire, but suspending negotiations over buffer zone specifics makes me wonder if they’re serious about peace.
Suspending talks over the Philadelphi corridor seems like a strategic move, but it’s risky—Israel won’t just give up border control after October 7.
I get Hamas wants the ceasefire to hold, but demanding full withdrawal from key areas like the Netzarim corridor is a non-starter for Israel.
It’s interesting they propose a temporary suspension—sounds like they’re trying to buy time or pressure mediators without fully walking away.
The article mentions Qatar and Egypt are mediating, but if Hamas keeps shifting demands, how can anyone trust them to stick to a deal?
Focusing on prisoner swaps and a comprehensive deal is smart, but suspending talks over the Philadelphi axis might backfire if Israel sees it as bad faith.
Hamas says they’re still committed to the ceasefire, but suspending negotiations over buffer zone specifics makes me wonder if they’re serious about peace.